----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bastien Nocera" <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM > Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera: > > >> Well, I'll understand these aspects. > > >> > > >> But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking > > >> about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize > > >> and take advantage of my computer and in this case my operating system. > > > > > > You're free to select another firewall zone > > > > so why do you not make secure defaults and say "You're free to select > > another (more unsecure) firewall zone"? > > 1) It is secure enough and Eclipse listening to a port by default is a bug > (and I have the firewall specialists at Red Hat/Fedora to back me up) I have Eclipse open and it's not listening to a port AFAIKT. I wonder what obscure plugin is installed in Eclipse to make this happen. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team > 2) Good defaults > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
