On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:21:26AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:42:36PM +0100, Juan Orti wrote: > > El 2014-11-27 14:48, Reindl Harald escribió: > > >Am 27.11.2014 um 14:25 schrieb Juan Orti: > > >>Reindl, I'm of the opinion you should upload your scripts to some git > > >>repository and package them to be part of the distribution. I can > > >>co-maintain if you wish > > > > > >feel free to package it! > > > > > >that's why i attached it as i saw the topic > > >i am not a active packager on the Fedora infrastrcuture > > > > Ok, I've uploaded the scripts to GitHub and submitted a review request: > > > > https://github.com/jorti/zram-swap > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168692 > I have a question about the code: why are multiple swap devices needed? > /sys/block/zram0/max_comp_streams can be set to whatever number is > wanted. While it might be useful to have additional zram devices > for different purposes, I don't think more than one zram swap is > useful. If you only have one device, then reloading the module is > no longer necessary to change the parameters, since everything > else seems to be configurable through sysfs. And another question (sorry, I never used compressed swap before): why not zswap? It seems to be a better fit for the desktop/server environments that Fedora is used for. IIUC, zswap is better because it overflows automatically into the backing swap device. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
