Hi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Using a wiki to track bugs is obviously not ideal. Any change can be tracked in bugzilla. We track upstream issues in Fedora bugzilla all the time. Maintainers can either fix it if they are interested or let a proven packager do it for them. Don't see how this is much of a burden.
Well, specifically, we didn't want to use bugzilla. I'm not sure I'm
speaking for everyone, but I think that's because it's not really the best
place for minor upstream issues.
Using a wiki to track bugs is obviously not ideal. Any change can be tracked in bugzilla. We track upstream issues in Fedora bugzilla all the time. Maintainers can either fix it if they are interested or let a proven packager do it for them. Don't see how this is much of a burden.
We also discussed being okay with a plan to use proven packager rights to
fix the issues, but I'd be concerned with accidentally introducing new bugs,
so I'd like that to be a team of people who really care about this and will
double-check each others' work. If there _are_ a team of such people, then I
don't think we'll get in the way.
Fair enough. So I guess the question is, is anyone else interested? If so, please speak up and let me know here or offlist. If OTOH, noone else is, that by itself would suggest this isn't a idea worth pursuing and I will drop it. Thanks!
I think it's worth... not really getting in the way of, but it seems pretty
clear that we don't want an effort to do that to impose any additional cost
on packagers. There are plenty of other things to worry about.
There always is.
Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
