On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:18:22PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Well, what I do with upstreams as an individual is not within FESCo's > purview and this message also appears to assume that downstream patches > would be needed. If no coordination can be done within Fedora, that is > effectively a rejection of the proposal which is fine. Just wanted to be > clear on that. See the transcript. I don't think there's any problem with coordinating it in Fedora in some way, but we don't want that to be a way that puts a burden on Fedora packagers unless they're interested. If you're interested in having a Fedora page which tracks affected upstreams, that'd be fine. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
