On 08.10.2014 14:50, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15: >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> [...] >> http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel-source/tree/patches.suse/btrfs-8888-add-allow_unsupported-module-parameter.patch?h=SLE11-SP3 >> http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel-source/tree/patches.suse/btrfs-8888-add-allow_unsupported-module-parameter.patch?h=SLE12 > [...] > I'm not thrilled with adding that patch to Fedora at all. Fully agreed. > […] They get away with this in SLE12 because it's roughly the first time > btrfs is available in a supported fashion. […] Well, it's supported since SLE11SP2 already, which is more than two years old, but the point in the end is the same, yes. But FWIW, it seems that simply how they work afaics, as they do something similar to ext4, too: http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel-source/tree/patches.suse/ext4-unsupported-features.patch?h=SLE12 CU knurd -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
