2014-10-03 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: >> This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure >> to be an attractive platform for such use cases. >> >> DId you consider providing a copr repository ? > > > A COPR repository probably wouldn't work, because they'd have to provide > a conflicting version of the ruby platform. I doubt that would fly. They > *could* stick a private copy of ruby in a non-standard location and use > it, but that's an awful lot of work for uncertain gain. > > * I'm not an OpenShift dev > In this case, I was thinking about using an SCL. Just asking, not forcing a burden upon anyone.m I guess, this is where the work from Env&Stack WG will be critical to ensure that Fedora remains a viable platform for services developers (not only OpenShift). H. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
