On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: > This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure > to be an attractive platform for such use cases. > > DId you consider providing a copr repository ? A COPR repository probably wouldn't work, because they'd have to provide a conflicting version of the ruby platform. I doubt that would fly. They *could* stick a private copy of ruby in a non-standard location and use it, but that's an awful lot of work for uncertain gain. * I'm not an OpenShift dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
