Re: Bodhi-Problem? -> Firefox 32 / Thunderbird 31.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There are currently "208 Pending Updates"
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F20/pending

On the left column it shows 112 pending updates.

I have never seen it go down to zero?

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:24:58 +0200
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>> > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200
>> > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald
>> >>> <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * the update has more than enough karma
>> >>>> * it's even not visible in updates-testing
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20
>> >>>
>> >>> So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide
>> >>
>> >> maybe
>> >>
>> >> but somebody should take action, these are security relevant
>> >> updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora
>> >
>> > There's several issues here:
>> >
>> > 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and
>> > push to testing.
>> >
>> > 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to
>> > testing, so it's not gone into testing.
>> >
>> > 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted
>> > blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this
>> > update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly
>> > about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after
>> > Alpha is go
>>
>> that's a Fedora 20 update and not relevant for F21 Alpha freeze
>
> Indeed. I misread. ;)
>
> But the reason for the autoqa failure was that the f21 update wasn't
> pushed due to freeze.
>
> In any case, the maintainer can submit to stable or testing as they
> like.
>
> kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux