On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald > > <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure > >> > >> * the update has more than enough karma > >> * it's even not visible in updates-testing > >> > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 > > > > "Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this > > update due to failure of an AutoQA test. Update submitter, please > > check the AutoQA test result and see if there is a valid problem to > > be fixed here, and fix it if so. If the failure is a mistake on > > AutoQA's part, you can re-enable the automatic push feature for > > this update if you like, or push it stable manually once it reaches > > the requirements under the Updates Policy. " > > > > So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide > > maybe > > but somebody should take action, these are security relevant updates > deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora There's several issues here: 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push to testing. 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to testing, so it's not gone into testing. 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after Alpha is go. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
