On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:24:58 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200 > > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01: > >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald > >>> <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure > >>>> > >>>> * the update has more than enough karma > >>>> * it's even not visible in updates-testing > >>>> > >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20 > >>> > >>> So seems like its newer than either F21 and/or rawhide > >> > >> maybe > >> > >> but somebody should take action, these are security relevant > >> updates deployed all over the plant including Android except Fedora > > > > There's several issues here: > > > > 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and > > push to testing. > > > > 1) The update got karma to go stable before it was even pushed to > > testing, so it's not gone into testing. > > > > 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted > > blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this > > update doesn't. Someone could propose one if they felt strongly > > about it. Failing that it's not going to go 'stable' until after > > Alpha is go > > that's a Fedora 20 update and not relevant for F21 Alpha freeze Indeed. I misread. ;) But the reason for the autoqa failure was that the f21 update wasn't pushed due to freeze. In any case, the maintainer can submit to stable or testing as they like. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
