On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:38:44AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:38:20AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The reason for dependency on systemd is different: if a package carries
> > a systemd unit, it should usually be enabled according to presets. It
> > should also be cleaned up when the package is removed. This requires
> > a dependency on systemd which carries the preset settings and utilities
> > to do this.
>
> Maybe better place for presets would be fedora-release-* package?
This was discussed of fedora-devel [1], but in the end there doesn't seem to
be a good home for the presets. In the end, having it in systemd is not too
bad, especially that it makes systemd maintainers look at the unit files
when they are added to presets to be enabled by default.
Zbyszek
[1] Thread titled "Proposal to WGs and rel-eng: Move 90-default.preset
from systemd to fedora-release"
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
