Re: systemd dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:32:26AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Vít,

> 
> Recently I have noticed that systemd package dependency is creeping into
> some packages where it is not necessary. subversion [1] or rsync [2] are
> good examples. Please consider moving daemon parts into independent
> subpackages. When I install rsync/subversion, I am typically interested
> just in client side.

At some point in time (F16 IIRC) we had systemd-units package which contained
/etc/rpm/macros.systemd file. Packagers which followed our guidelines used for
example %{unitdir} macro in %files. Hence they added systemd-units to
BuildRequires.

These days systemd-units no longer exists, macro file moved to systemd rpm and
systemd-units is a provided by systemd rpm. Therefore systemd proper creeping
into buildroots.

> 
> Just to be clear, systemd-libs is in minimal build root already, so I am
> not complaining about systemd-libs package, but about systemd package.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Vít

Michal
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133786
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123813
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux