Re: systemd dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26.08.14 11:06, Michal Sekletar (msekleta@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> > Recently I have noticed that systemd package dependency is creeping into
> > some packages where it is not necessary. subversion [1] or rsync [2] are
> > good examples. Please consider moving daemon parts into independent
> > subpackages. When I install rsync/subversion, I am typically interested
> > just in client side.
> 
> At some point in time (F16 IIRC) we had systemd-units package which contained
> /etc/rpm/macros.systemd file. Packagers which followed our guidelines used for
> example %{unitdir} macro in %files. Hence they added systemd-units to
> BuildRequires.
> 
> These days systemd-units no longer exists, macro file moved to systemd rpm and
> systemd-units is a provided by systemd rpm. Therefore systemd proper creeping
> into buildroots.

Yeah, we removed the systemd-units package a while after systemd was the
only init system we supported on Fedora...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux