Re: systemd dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Perhaps the bug is this: that you need to install a whole other RPM
> just to make a directory exist so you can put a file in it.
> 
> Why can't the RPM providing the file just make the directory and not
> have a dependency at all?

It used to work (more or less) that way.  The problem is when a
directory is supposed to have specific ownership/permission settings,
only the package that actually owns the directory has that configured.
It doesn't make sense to try to put that info in every package (should
the rsync RPM know the permissions of /usr/lib/systemd/system?).

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux