Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx <mailto:dennis@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do "dnf clean metadata && dnf update" purely because I found most of > the time dnfs metadata was out of date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work > right. But I'm not sure that me or rawhide fits into the experience dnf is trying to give. > > Dennis > > > Dnf-0.5.2 has a --refresh option, there will a check if the repo metadata is newer than the cached one. > > so. > > dnf update --refresh will check and update metadata if needed *that* would be a useful default instead background-refreshes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
