Am 17.06.2014 21:36, schrieb Stijn Hoop: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200 >> Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice. >> >> Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem. >> >> kevin >> > > This, please do not invent some generic name and be forced in 10 years > to rename yet again with the same arguments. > > Either keep the dnf name: > > - and update all documentation basically with s/yum/dnf/g > - and make sure it's big in the release notes > - and provide a yum frontend with compatibility warnings the problem is you can't update all documentations out there that is an ongoing problem - there are here and there howtos for setups built with more than one component and if it comes to changes here and there without a very good reason the step-by-step howto becomes invalid > or rename dnf to yum and call it 4.0: > > - and warn programmers that the interface has changed > - and make sure that obsoleted options warn of changed defaults > > My preference is the latter, basically because I don't see the wins > in the first case, FWIW +1 a new major version always indicates that there may be some *well justified changes* and thats why major.minor.bugfix exists - sadly these days more and more projetcs ignore this vesioning by missing knowledge or not care and follow google chrome
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
