On 16. 6. 2014 at 19:49:35, Peter Oliver wrote: > On 16 June 2014 08:31, Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 13. 6. 2014 at 10:09:07, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> So I propose we keep calling the project DNF and the package dnf, but > >> start the transition to a generic command name for "the tool that > >> installs, removes, and updates packages". I propose that this command > >> name be called "pkg". We can keep backwards compatibility to both the > >> "yum" command name and the "dnf" command name indefinitely. > > > > Sounds like an interesting idea and we will definitely give this some > > thought. > If you decide to go this route, it's worth bearing in mind that > Solaris 11 and FreeBSD 10 both already have tools called "pkg" that > perform this function. They are incompatible with yum and dnf, but > have a similar-enough command-line that people searching the web for, > say, "pkg install" will find information about the wrong one. Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
