On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200 > Jan Zelený <jzeleny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice. > > Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem. > > kevin > This, please do not invent some generic name and be forced in 10 years to rename yet again with the same arguments. Either keep the dnf name: - and update all documentation basically with s/yum/dnf/g - and make sure it's big in the release notes - and provide a yum frontend with compatibility warnings or rename dnf to yum and call it 4.0: - and warn programmers that the interface has changed - and make sure that obsoleted options warn of changed defaults My preference is the latter, basically because I don't see the wins in the first case, FWIW. --Stijn -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
