2014-05-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions.
> Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of
>>> funny.
>>
>> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
>> allowed it.
> you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did
> not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in
> your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer
> to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed
> FHS update and from where it comes
/run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates
needless and nothing but annoying differences.
Nah. /usr/libexec is a good place to store system-wide helper binaries without having to worry about the patch changing due to multilib; remember systemd has had to receive an explicit exception[1] for its scheme of storing everything-in /usr/lib/systemd as if it were /opt/systemd, with many of the files located there violating the intent of FHS.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
