Am 05.05.2014 22:03, schrieb Kay Sievers: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers: >>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of >>>> funny. >>> >>> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB >>> allowed it. > >> you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did >> not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in >> your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer >> to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed >> FHS update and from where it comes > > It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions. > /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates > needless and nothing but annoying differences the follwing is *not* any sort of attack your you it's pointless for people maintaining existing machines with existing configurations, systemd-units and so on it's pointless to fix and debug things which are working because "reasonable decisions" you need to distinct between * reasonable with no impact * reasonable with impact left and right around you * change for the sake of change
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
