On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700 > Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services >> >> include iptables and udev. >> > I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's >> > persistent and is a bad example. >> >> Thanks :) >> >> If no one tells me otherwise today, I will take the lack of objections >> to the mass bug filing as consensus. > > It seems like it might be workable to have a provenpackager fix up any > of these not fixed in a few weeks... > > If you would like to add to the text that after 3 weeks provenpackagers > may step in and fix these issues, that might be good? Or is there some > reason that wouldn't be a good idea? As long as the provenpackager is wiling to double-check that the change is correct, it sounds good to me. Most of these seem like copies of a buggy sysv conversion script and don't even happen on initial installation, so it seems very unlikely that important package functionality depends on the scripts running. --Andy > > kevin > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
