Re: Mass bug proposal: packages that auto-enable systemd units

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services
> >> include iptables and udev.
> > I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's
> > persistent and is a bad example.
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> If no one tells me otherwise today, I will take the lack of objections
> to the mass bug filing as consensus.

It seems like it might be workable to have a provenpackager fix up any
of these not fixed in a few weeks...

If you would like to add to the text that after 3 weeks provenpackagers
may step in and fix these issues, that might be good? Or is there some
reason that wouldn't be a good idea?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux