On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 13:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:13:29 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > On 04/23/2014 12:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:51:21 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > > > >> I can only guess, but i386 updates being pushed to a x86_64 repo sounds > > >> like a bug to me. > > > > > > No, it's a pretty normal thing the mash multilib compose strategy does. > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mash.git/tree/\ > > > > No, Java is exempt from multilib, see: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/961 > > Yes, see my other reply in this thread. Here I only replied to the general > "i386 updates being pushed to a x86_64 repo sounds like a bug to me", > which is wrong. Thanks for clarifying, Michael! Learned something. Cheers, Severin -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
