2014-04-17 22:27 GMT+02:00 Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxx>:
Writing too fast... you were actually arguing for a situation "2 used by default + 1 used but not used by default" I think. In that case your argument is right but it's my turn to not accept your premise :) networkd was introduced in systemd-209, and F20 ships with -208, I.e. it has never shipped in a Fedora release, so it is not "1 used but not used by default"; it's entirely new to Fedora in F21.2014-04-17 21:54 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:47:21PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:> Is NetworkManager already at the *100% complete* feature parity that would
> > (NetworkManager and initscripts) and one that's available but not used by
> > default anywhere (systemd-networkd). This would simply swap the status of
> > systemd-networkd and initscripts.
> make this possible? (Keeping in mind that "possible" and "a good idea" areI don't think I accept your premise here. 100% (possibly spread between
> still not the same...)
networkd and NetworkManager) would be necessary for dropping initscripts
completely, but that's not being proposed.You were arguing that we would be going from 2 used + 1 unused systems to a different set of 2 used + 1 unused; for that to happen, users of initscripts must have somewhere to migrate to.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
