On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 07:39 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > +1 > > And yep, it should go to FESCo - this has much more bigger scope than 10.0.3 > due to LLVM update. You know I'm more than ok with updates to Fn-1 but this > one should be coordinated very well. Can you (or anyone else) elaborate on the issues you're concerned with here? If I'm going to have to play Simon Says about this I'd like some opportunity to address (or at least investigate) concerns ahead of time. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
