On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 08:21 +0000, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: > On 25/03/14 03:00 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 17:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Saying that "nobody" wants this, it's "madness", "totally wacky", > >> "almost all users are NOT going to put up with this" is going rather > >> too > >> far. I think it's entirely worth the Desktop product making this > >> possible and I suspect quite a lot of people will use it, but I don't > >> think it's sufficient grounds for downgrading the spins too far in > >> importance or dropping them. > > > > That language was probably too harsh, sorry. Let's try again: I think a > > large (or huge) subset of users will be dissatisfied with the procedure > > for installing alternate desktops through GNOME Software, and will opt > > to not install Workstation at all. I don't think this will be a surprise > > to anybody. > > > > As long as we still have spins, it's not really a big deal. > > The question this brings up then is: what's the point of Workstation then? > (We have come full circle back to this question...) We've already discussed this, but to put it simply, just because we *have* both Products and spins doesn't mean we have to attach equal importance to them all, in any number of ways. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
