On 03/19/2014 01:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > There is also a proposal for a "Fedora Plasma" product based around KDE. I'm > personally a little skeptical but listening -- I think want a technology > showcase masquerading as a product would miss the point, and I'd like to be > convinced that this is more than that. > > We have an open question in FESCo over whether KDE should be release > blocking (there's a ticket for today's meeting), and there's some debate > over whether it's necessary for a desktop to be represented at the product > level in order to be considered blocking. (And I think that this issue is > driving the product push to some degree.) My take on this is: KDE should be release blocking. It's strongly represented in Fedora, both in terms of users and available developer resources. We should make sure KDE is fully functional before rolling out a Fedora release. KDE should not be a top level Product. In my opinion, Fedora should only produce the currently listed 3 Products and not more. Otherwise we get back at square 1 where we have too many offerings and nobody knows what makes a supported Fedora. KDE should stay a separate spin with its own install media. Just as it is now; nobody is taking that away. And possibly it could evolve a bit more towards a separate derivative, with it's own home page and marketing; similar to how Kubuntu is to Ubuntu now. -- Kalev, Fedora Workstation WG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
