On 03/24/2014 12:48 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:>> >>>>> And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim >>>>> to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there. >>>> >>>> Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do. >>> >>> Hi Andrew, can you be a little more specific about the potential harm >>> you see with keeping GCJ in Fedora? >> >> I think Rahul already answered this. Do you expect me to >> say something different from him? > > Well, speaking of "harm", yes, I do. > > Don't take me wrong. I just want to know if there is any reason beyond > maintainer unwillingness/ lack of time. No, I don't think there is, beyond the usual objections to leaving packages to rot. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
