Re: GCJ [was: pdftk retired?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley  wrote:
>> On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:>>
>>> And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim
>>> to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there.
>>
>> Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do.
> 
> Hi Andrew, can you be a little more specific about the potential harm
> you see with keeping GCJ in Fedora?

I think Rahul already answered this.  Do you expect me to
say something different from him?

Andrew.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux