On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:>> >>>> And JDK5 might be good enough for the use required. It doesn't claim >>>> to be anything more than that, so I don't see the harm in leaving it there. >>> >>> Speaking as the upstream maintainer, I do. >> >> Hi Andrew, can you be a little more specific about the potential harm >> you see with keeping GCJ in Fedora? > > I think Rahul already answered this. Do you expect me to > say something different from him? Well, speaking of "harm", yes, I do. Don't take me wrong. I just want to know if there is any reason beyond maintainer unwillingness/ lack of time. Thanks, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
