Am 22.03.2014 03:05, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Fri, 21.03.14 23:35, Reindl Harald (h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >>> In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or removed in Fedora we have to not only >>> deal with our usual politics and bureaucracy but also all the downstream distribution to us as well... >> >> no, in other words he told you that whe world is not turning around >> a few people deperecating anything which does not get a update for >> the sake of a update and what some people calling "legacy" might >> be things not needing updates because they just works and update >> and replace/drop for the sake of a change does not make things >> better for no good reason >> >> the author of tcpwrapper is Wietse Venema, the perosn who created >> and maintains postfix - frankly if only 1% of the software out > > So, you do realise that the same Wietse Venema who wrote and then > stopped maintaining tcpwrappers is the one who didn't add *any* > tcpwrappers support to Postfix? To this day Postfix doesn't do > tcpwrappers. Probably for a good reason, don't you think? until you managed the same stability of interfaces for a couple of years like postfix don't strip quotes >> most of the replacements in the last few years could have been >> becakward compatible if the developers would not be too lazy >> to care about > > Wietse is such a lazy person that he didn't had hosts.allow/.deny > compatibility support to Postfix, isn't he? ask him why
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
