On Fri, 21.03.14 23:35, Reindl Harald (h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or removed in Fedora we have to not only > > deal with our usual politics and bureaucracy but also all the downstream distribution to us as well... > > no, in other words he told you that whe world is not turning around > a few people deperecating anything which does not get a update for > the sake of a update and what some people calling "legacy" might > be things not needing updates because they just works and update > and replace/drop for the sake of a change does not make things > better for no good reason > > the author of tcpwrapper is Wietse Venema, the perosn who created > and maintains postfix - frankly if only 1% of the software out So, you do realise that the same Wietse Venema who wrote and then stopped maintaining tcpwrappers is the one who didn't add *any* tcpwrappers support to Postfix? To this day Postfix doesn't do tcpwrappers. Probably for a good reason, don't you think? > most of the replacements in the last few years could have been > becakward compatible if the developers would not be too lazy > to care about Wietse is such a lazy person that he didn't had hosts.allow/.deny compatibility support to Postfix, isn't he? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
