Re: Packages with missing %check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:09 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:50:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 21:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >   It happens too often in
> > > Rawhide, and a simple test (in %check or elsewhere) could fix it.
> > 
> > You can't really test a system boot in a package's %check. That's very
> > definitely not what it's for.
> 
> It turns out you can.  Read the link I posted:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/qemu-sanity-check/

I've read it. I'm not exactly convinced.

> Yes, it doesn't catch every possible problem, but the kernel is
> sometimes pushed out with major problems that could be caught with
> simple testing.

IIRC you had one example for this, and the bug turned out to be racy and
hardware-dependent, which is why the kernel devs didn't see it in the
tests they *do* actually do.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux