Re: Packages with missing %check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:58:43PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2014-02-26 14:11 GMT+01:00 Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > During making glib changes you should run glib unit tests to have some
> > basic level of assurance you didn't introduce regressions or unwanted
> > changes.
> >
> > The *very first* test I run is "does the OS still boot"?  That's called
> > "smoketest" for me, and it only takes a few minutes.
> >
> 
> That seems to be optimizing for bugs that break the boot, when bugs that
> occur in less-frequently used parts of the system are far more common; a
> lot of software is not used, or not critical, in the boot path.

But bugs which break the boot prevent you from testing everything else.

Libguestfs currently is the de-facto test of bugs that break the boot,
and TBH it's not a job I enjoy having.  It happens too often in
Rawhide, and a simple test (in %check or elsewhere) could fix it.  I
even wrote a simple tool to perform the test:

http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/qemu-sanity-check/

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux