Re: Packages with missing %check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:50:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 21:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >   It happens too often in
> > Rawhide, and a simple test (in %check or elsewhere) could fix it.
> 
> You can't really test a system boot in a package's %check. That's very
> definitely not what it's for.

It turns out you can.  Read the link I posted:

http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/qemu-sanity-check/

Yes, it doesn't catch every possible problem, but the kernel is
sometimes pushed out with major problems that could be caught with
simple testing.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux