On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 05:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I really don't know why you make these suggestions. I mean, you must > > know no-one is going to reply "Why, Kevin! What a brilliant idea! We'll > > do so immediately!", so what's the point? > > Why not? That's the only reply that possibly makes sense. It's not a question of whether the change makes sense as policy, but the way in which you're doing it: devel@ isn't really where policy gets changed. A FESCo ticket would be the way to go, I think. I don't have a strong opinion on abolishing it or not. It's an area with a bit of a data lack. We could try not enabling it by default, but would we then wind up with an ocean of un-pushed updates? It's hard to guess. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
