Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:50:12PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:38:56AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think %check is a good idea at all.
> 
> I think the benefit depends on the level of patching the Fedora maintainer
> is doing. If they are shipping just vanilla upstream tar.gz then they can
> have a moderate level of confidence in the functionality of their package
> without tests, since you can assume upstream ran their test before release.

Upstream may not have run the test on all archs supported by Fedora.
ARM is probably still not something we can assume everyone has. I was
dealing with a test which failed only on 32-bit systems just
yesterday, I didn't notice it until I tried building the package in
koji.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux