Re: [Fedora-packaging] May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 16:08, Alexander Todorov wrote:
[...]
> Guys I can do both.
> 
> 1) Report packages which *have* test suites but they are *not* executed in %check
> 
> 2) Report packages which *don't* have any test suites at all.
> 
> 1) is easy but I'm more interested in 2)

Could you provide the rationale for 2? Why do you want to do it and
what does Fedora gain by doing it?

IMHO, 1 is the only one worth having filed as a bugs in our bugzilla.
You can track 2 any way you like, but mass bug filing is the wrong way.
It's not a bug in the Fedora package that upstream doesn't have a test
suite and I'll be sure to close such bugs as WONTFIX.

Personally, I do try to run the test suite in %check for my packages,
provided that it doesn't require (much) patching and is easy to do.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux