----- Original Message -----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:27:41 -0600
> Jon <jdisnard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Propose the unit file be packaged.
> >
> > * Releng does not want this in fedora-release.
> Not true, just not convinced its the best place for it. If it turns out
> it really is the best place then I will gladly add it.
>
> > * Going in kickstart files is not happy.
> should be a absolute non starter, many installs happen interactively
> and would never get the file
>
> >
> > We could call the package:
> > fedora-systemd-defaults-{base,workstation,server}
>
> i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> fedora-config-<foo> it could put other config snippets, or pull in
> packages for the experience of the product.
+1, do not limit it to one particular technology - in that case we
could end with bunch of fedora-xxxxxx-defaults - and it makes sense
to have some bits in the same location defining the same product.
But otherwise, at least for now, this seems as pretty much what we
should do.
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
