Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:44:12 -0800
> Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky
> > ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and
> > libreoffice is another...), so I think it's reasonable to assume the
> > icu maintainer isn't going to be doing them all, and help out with
> > the rest. gnustep is being a PITA now. le sigh.
> 
> I'll also note that the icu maintain is not a provenpackager.

It was mainly a communication problem: I was prepared to handle the
rebuilds, but when Eike did not ping me that he built new ICU, I assumed
that he got hold of some other provenpackager :-(

D.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux