Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>    From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built
> few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person
> can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump.
> 
>    Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should announce on
> devel list first. Looks like harfbuzz package is picked twice for
> these rebuilds. Both rebuilds happened in within 30 minutes time
> period.

It doesn't really cause any terrible pain for a double rebuild to
happen. devel@ being flooded with "I'm about to rebuild X!" would
certainly cause a lot more inconvenience.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux