Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 09:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi all,  
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>         On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>         > Hi,
>         >
>         >    From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4
>         people built
>         > few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a
>         single person
>         > can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname
>         bump.
>         >
>         >    Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should
>         announce on
>         > devel list first. Looks like harfbuzz package is picked
>         twice for
>         > these rebuilds. Both rebuilds happened in within 30 minutes
>         time
>         > period.
>         
>         
>         It doesn't really cause any terrible pain for a double rebuild
>         to
>         happen. devel@ being flooded with "I'm about to rebuild X!"
>         would
>         certainly cause a lot more inconvenience.
> 
> 
>  Right there is no harm. One can only bump the release and carry a
> rebuild without any change in spec. What I thought is that generally
> people whose packages gets soname bump used to carry package rebuilds
> for its dependent packages also. Same has already happened with libicu
> soname bump in the past. This time it was not clear if libicu
> maintainer is going for these package rebuilds or not.
> 
>   Anyway I assume libicu maintainer want to only push libicu update
> and let the dependent package owners to rebuild their packages. I have
> just rebuilt fontmatrix now.

icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky
ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and libreoffice
is another...), so I think it's reasonable to assume the icu maintainer
isn't going to be doing them all, and help out with the rest. gnustep is
being a PITA now. le sigh.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux