On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 09:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 > people built > > few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a > single person > > can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname > bump. > > > > Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should > announce on > > devel list first. Looks like harfbuzz package is picked > twice for > > these rebuilds. Both rebuilds happened in within 30 minutes > time > > period. > > > It doesn't really cause any terrible pain for a double rebuild > to > happen. devel@ being flooded with "I'm about to rebuild X!" > would > certainly cause a lot more inconvenience. > > > Right there is no harm. One can only bump the release and carry a > rebuild without any change in spec. What I thought is that generally > people whose packages gets soname bump used to carry package rebuilds > for its dependent packages also. Same has already happened with libicu > soname bump in the past. This time it was not clear if libicu > maintainer is going for these package rebuilds or not. > > Anyway I assume libicu maintainer want to only push libicu update > and let the dependent package owners to rebuild their packages. I have > just rebuilt fontmatrix now. icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and libreoffice is another...), so I think it's reasonable to assume the icu maintainer isn't going to be doing them all, and help out with the rest. gnustep is being a PITA now. le sigh. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct