On Thu, 13.02.14 17:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to > > > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better > > > place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and > > > contains Fedora specific configuration files (i.e. Fedora repo > > > files). The question of moving the file somewhere else than systemd > > > might be really interesting for working groups either. It defines > > > which services should be enabled by default after installation, which > > > might differ for different products. (Or not, has anybody thought > > > about this yet?) An example off top of my head - we would like to > > > have sshd enabled after installation by default on server, but > > > disabled on workstation. > > > > > > I would like to ask release engineering for any feedback and > > > representatives of working groups to discuss this on their meetings. > From systemd side, this seems like a right move. Coupling the presets > to systemd package means that they are often unnecessarily delayed. > Wherever they are moved, I think it is important that package has > plenty of maintainers who can do small updates as necessary. I fully agree. The preset files really don't belong in the systemd package, and it would be great to move them to fedora-release or so... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
