On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, if the products want to diverge on what to start/enable, we could > do this I suppose. It's been suggested that we look at having a > fedora-release for each product (with deps on those things the product > advertises as part of their deliverable). If we go that route, this > file could live in each of those products fedora-release. (ie, > fedora-release-workstation, fedora-release-server, fedora-release-cloud > or whatever). I'm envisioning this as additive -- "fedora-release" for all (as part of the base design) and fedora-release-whatever on top of that. I think it _probably_ makes sense for the base release to provide one level of defaults and for the release-whatevers to override that where appropriate. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
