On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100 > Václav Pavlín <vpavlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > ...snip... > > > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to > > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better > > place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and > > contains Fedora specific configuration files (i.e. Fedora repo > > files). The question of moving the file somewhere else than systemd > > might be really interesting for working groups either. It defines > > which services should be enabled by default after installation, which > > might differ for different products. (Or not, has anybody thought > > about this yet?) An example off top of my head - we would like to > > have sshd enabled after installation by default on server, but > > disabled on workstation. > > > > I would like to ask release engineering for any feedback and > > representatives of working groups to discuss this on their meetings. >From systemd side, this seems like a right move. Coupling the presets to systemd package means that they are often unnecessarily delayed. Wherever they are moved, I think it is important that package has plenty of maintainers who can do small updates as necessary. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
