2014-02-02 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> We can have a KDE Product, and an Xfce Product, and an LXDE Product, >> but...at that point haven't we just re-invented spins? It doesn't seem >> to quite work with the Product conception. > > Why not? > > I see only 2 acceptable outcomes, either KDE becomes a Product or the whole > concept of "Products" gets dropped. > > The KDE spin has always been a release-blocking deliverable, why should we > get degraded to a second-class citizen? > > Kevin Kofler Why do you think only about KDE? This topic shouldn't turn into a DE war IMHO. The product for Desktop users should be just one, Workstation. And KDE, as Xfce or LXDE are part of this product and should live under the wing of the Workstation. That's not a degration in my eyes, just another array, and it's not constructive to have for every DE environment a separate product. Fedora.next is not this, fedora.next aims to have 3 main products for different use cases, there is no reason to have a separate product for every single Spin unless we want to go backwards again. -- Robert Mayr (robyduck) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
