Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



PS:

I wrote:

> Adam Williamson wrote:
> The KDE spin has always been a release-blocking deliverable, why should we
> get degraded to a second-class citizen?

Sorry, poor choice of words there: The KDE spin has been a release-blocking 
deliverable for years. This hasn't ALWAYS been the case, in fact I do 
remember that we did have to fight for this achievement, but I really don't 
long back to the dark ages where we didn't have that status.

The goal should be to let ALL desktop spins get equal treatment (and equal 
with the GNOME spin no matter whether it's called "Desktop Spin", 
"Workstation Product" or whatever silly marketing name), and in particular, 
release-blocking status, NOT to remove it from the KDE Spin.

Why does Fedora always have to give GNOME preferential treatment?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux