Am 27.01.2014 01:32, schrieb Chris Murphy: > On Jan 26, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 27.01.2014 01:18, schrieb Chris Murphy: >>> You gave several examples of rollback-snapshot methods - same thing as you suggested them. I never said you requested them >> >> oh my god - i gave several examples *what could be dangerous* in doing that >> i *never* ever suggested them >> please re-read the thread and then come back with an excuse > > "suggested them" can mean two things in English: you recommend them, or they are examples. I mean the 2nd case. I understand that you were not ever recommending your examples. You were suggesting them as examples why snapshots in general are bad. > > The problem is that your examples are crap. They're bad examples because they would break the system, therefore no one would actually do snapshots-rollbacks per your examples, unless they wanted to blow up their system. boah the fact "therefore no one would actually do snapshots-rollbacks per your examples" needs to be proven i only just warned about cases where a rollback would do harm and to *make sure* that really no one would do it without take care so where is now the point you started a flamewar against me instead be quite or say "ok, that would be bad and hopefully does not happen" this is a *dvelopent dicussion* and the goal of it is to *prevent* mistakes ever happen *before* they are implemented or widely used
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
