On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:41:13 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > AIUI there is/was a long-term plan to integrate this as core > functionality using btrfs snapshots - in fact that was one of the > major attractions of the idea of switching to btrfs-by-default in the > first place. I believe those involved didn't think the LVM-based > implementation was clean/robust enough to use by default, but a > btrfs-based implementation would be. Do correct me if I'm wrong. I don't think snapshots are a partcularly good solution, unless there's some way to only roll back the rpm/yum transaction without also rolling back unrelated changes. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
