On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 24.01.2014 19:31, schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >> Am 24.01.2014 19:18, schrieb drago01: >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Am Freitag, den 24.01.2014, 00:55 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: >>>>> it is time to analyze the fallout from the following catastrophic >>>>> Fedora 20 >>>>> regression: >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 >>>>> "rpm scriptlets are exiting with status 127" >>>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> can't we add a default boot entry which starts the system in permissive >>>> mode? >>> >>> How would that help? If a user knows enough about the issue to try it >>> he/she could just switch to permissive mode >> >> in *that* case >> >> in a case where a broken selinux update leads in not boot at all >> i can not imagine what i would to besides boot with a CD/DVD/USB > > to be clear - *i can* edit the boot-params and put selinux=0 there > > the average user can't but he may remember "uhm something with selinux > was one of the last updates" You are assuming that the "averange user" even knows what selinux is or reviews the list of packages for every update. I doubt either of them is true. >and try the however named option, keep > in mind some people own only one machine and can't google for help I doubt that. Most people do have multiple ways to access the internet (multiple computers, tablets, phones, game consoles ...) it is 2014 not 1996. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
